UPTET - टीईटी - TET
UPTET - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT HEARING DETAIL ON 27-9-2012
?Court No. - 53
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 29 of 2012
Petitioner :- Shiv Prakash Kushwaha
Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Others
Petitioner Counsel :- S.K. Mishra
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.,K.S.Kushwaha,R.A. Aktar,Rajeshwar Singh
Hon'ble Arun Tandon,J.
Counsel for the petitioner Shri S.K.Mishra submits that prayer no. 1 in the present petition has become infructuous in view of the fact that the Advertisement has already been withdrawn.
So far as the prayer no. 2 is concerned, it is submitted that the State may be asked to publish the Advertisement and at that stage petitioner if required the petitioners shall press for prayer no. 2. On his request the case is adjourned for ten days.
List on 09.10.12.
Dated :27.09.2012
VR/29/12
Source - http://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebShowJudgment.do
UPTET - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT HEARING DETAIL ON 27-9-2012
?Court No. - 53
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 29 of 2012
Petitioner :- Shiv Prakash Kushwaha
Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Others
Petitioner Counsel :- S.K. Mishra
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.,K.S.Kushwaha,R.A. Aktar,Rajeshwar Singh
Hon'ble Arun Tandon,J.
Counsel for the petitioner Shri S.K.Mishra submits that prayer no. 1 in the present petition has become infructuous in view of the fact that the Advertisement has already been withdrawn.
So far as the prayer no. 2 is concerned, it is submitted that the State may be asked to publish the Advertisement and at that stage petitioner if required the petitioners shall press for prayer no. 2. On his request the case is adjourned for ten days.
List on 09.10.12.
Dated :27.09.2012
VR/29/12
Source - http://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebShowJudgment.do
No comments:
Post a Comment