Pages

Thursday 24 May 2012

UPTET - Allahabad High Court - Hearing on 25th May 2012 regarding Stay on Primary Teacher Recruitment in UP

UPTET - Allahabad High Court - Hearing on 25th May 2012 regarding Stay on Primary Teacher Recruitment in UP

UPTET - Allahabad High Court - Hearing on 25th May 2012 regarding Stay on Primary Teacher Recruitment in UP


टी ई टी अभ्यर्थीयों के निर्णय का फेसला  -
अभ्यर्थी पल पल इन्तजार कर रहे हैं कि कब उनकी इन्तजार की घड़ियाँ समाप्त हों और रुकी हुई नियुक्ति प्रक्रिया प्रारंभ हो | 

See case details : 


 Cases for Final Hearing/Disposal starting from the oldest of the category assign
                                      -ed.
               -                                                  
                                   For Further Hearing
WRIT - A                                
 198. DF-PH 76039/2011 YADAV KAPILDEV LAL BAHADUR      ALOK KUMAR YADAV         
                                                       RAJESH YADAV
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS      C.S.C.                   
                                                       K.S. KUSHWAHA
WITH WRIA- 76355/2011 SARASWATI SRIVASTAVA            SAROJ YADAV              
                       Vs. THE STATE OF U.P. AND OTHE  C.S.C.                   
                       -RS                             C.N.TRIPATHI
                                                       R.A.AKHTAR
WITH WRIA- 76392/2011 SHIVANI                         ABHISHEK SRIVASTAVA      
                       Vs. THE STATE OF U.P. AND OTHE  C.S.C.                   
                       -RS                             RAJEEV JOSHI
                                                       C.N.TRIPATHI
WITH WRIA- 76595/2011 SABA ANJUM & OTHERS             INDRASEN SINGH TOMAR     
                                                       AMIT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. & ANOTHER     C.S.C.                   
                                                       K.S. KUSHWAHA
WITH WRIA- 1442/2012  VASUDEV CHAURASIA & OTHERS      RAVINDRA PRAKASH SRIV.   
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS      C.S.C.                   
                                                       AKHILESH KUMAR
                                                       R.A. AKHTAR
WITH WRIA- 75392/2011 VIJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI & ANOTHER  AJOY KUMAR BANERJEE      
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS      C.S.C.                   
                                                       K.A. USMANI
WITH WRIA- 2614/2012  MAHESH CHANDRA                  BHUPENDRA PAL SINGH      
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS      C.S.C.                   
                                                       S.S. BHADAURIYA
WITH WRIA- 2608/2012  MOHD. SADAB                     SYED IRFAN ALI           
                                                       MOHD. NAUSHAD
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS      C.S.C.                   
                                                       ILLEGIBLE
WITH WRIA- 6826/2012  VIMLESH KUMAR                   ALOK KUMAR YADAV         
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS      C.S.C.                   
                                                       R.S. PRASAD
                                                       R.A. AKTAR
WITH WRIA- 17607/2012 PAWAN KUMAR                     BHAWESH PRATAP SINGH     
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. & ANOTHER     C.S.C.                   
 WITH WRIA- 29/2012    SHIV PRAKASH KUSHWAHA           S.K. MISHRA              
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS      C.S.C.                   
                                                       RAJESHWAR SINGH
                                                       R.A. AKTAR
                                                       K.S.KUSHWAHA
WITH WRIA- 24062/2012 KAUSHAL KUMAR SHUKLA AND OTHER  SUDEEP DWIVEDI           
                       -S
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS    C.S.C.                   
                    HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN TANDON
              HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMRESHWAR PRATAP SAHTied Up and Part Hearing/disposal of applications.


 Source : Allahabad Highcourt Website

Wednesday 16 May 2012

बीटीसी अभ्यर्थियों की नियुक्ति पर रुख स्पष्ट करे सरकार


बीटीसी अभ्यर्थियों की नियुक्ति पर रुख स्पष्ट करे सरकार
इलाहाबाद : उच्च न्यायालय ने अध्यापक पात्रता परीक्षा (टीईटी) चयन के तहत नियुक्ति पर रोक की मांग में दाखिल याचिका की सुनवाई की अगली तिथि 25 मई नियत की है। आज राज्य सरकार की तरफ से न्यायालय में हलफनामा दाखिल कर बताया गया कि उर्दू बीटीसी, विशिष्ट बीटीसी व बीटीसी डिग्रीधारकों को टीईटी मेरिट आधार पर चयन प्रक्रिया से अलग रखा गया है। इन डिग्रीधारकों को भी अन्य टीईटी उत्तीर्ण अभ्यर्थियों के चयन में शामिल करने का फैसला लिया था जिसे सरकार ने वापस ले लिया है। अब इन डिग्रीधारकों का अलग से चयन किया जाएगा। सरकार के इस हलफनामे के बाद न्यायालय ने पूछा कि इनकी चयन प्रक्रिया कब शुरू होगी। इन डिग्रीधारकोंने याचिका दायर कर मांग की है कि उन्हें दुबारा प्रशिक्षण लेने के लिए बाध्य न किया जाय और चयनित अभ्यर्थियों की सीधी नियुक्ति कर दी जाय। इस पर न्यायालय ने सरकार का रुख जानना चाहा।
Source- Jagran

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD


HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

Case Status - Allahabad

Pending
Writ - A : 76039 of 2011 [Varanasi]
Petitioner:YADAV KAPILDEV LAL BAHADUR
Respondent:STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS
Counsel (Pet.):ALOK KUMAR YADAV
Counsel (Res.):C.S.C.
Category:Service-Writ Petitions Relating To Primary Education (teaching Staff) (single Bench)-Appointment
Date of Filing:21/12/2011
Last Listed on:15/05/2012 in Court No. 7
Next Listing Date (Likely):25/05/2012
This is not an authentic/certified copy of the information regarding status of a case. Authentic/certified information may be obtained under Chapter VIII Rule 30 of Allahabad High Court Rules. Mistake, if any, may be broucomments 
 Links to this postght to the notice of OSD (Computer).
Back

Tuesday 15 May 2012

UPTET - Allahabad High Court - Hearing on 15th May 2012

UPTET - Allahabad High Court - Hearing on 15th May 2012 regarding Stay on Primary Teacher Recruitment in UP


टी ई टी अभ्यर्थीयों के निर्णय का फेसला आज  -
अभ्यर्थी पल पल इन्तजार कर रहे हैं कि कब उनकी इन्तजार की घड़ियाँ समाप्त हों और रुकी हुई नियुक्ति प्रक्रिया प्रारंभ हो | 
संभव है आज उनकी सारी परेशानीयां समाप्त हो जाएँ व  अब और इन्तजार न करना पड़े  

CAUSE LIST ALLAHABAD

Cause List
15/05/2012

AT 10.00 A.M.
                    COURT NO. 7

                    HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN TANDON
                                   For Further Hearing
 WRIT - A                                
 238. DF-PH 76039/2011 YADAV KAPILDEV LAL BAHADUR      ALOK KUMAR YADAV         
                                                       RAJESH YADAV
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS      C.S.C.                   
                                                       K.S. KUSHWAHA
 WITH WRIA- 76355/2011 SARASWATI SRIVASTAVA            SAROJ YADAV              
                       Vs. THE STATE OF U.P. AND OTHE  C.S.C.                   
                       -RS                             C.N.TRIPATHI
                                                       R.A.AKHTAR
 WITH WRIA- 76392/2011 SHIVANI                         ABHISHEK SRIVASTAVA      
                       Vs. THE STATE OF U.P. AND OTHE  C.S.C.                   
                       -RS                             RAJEEV JOSHI
                                                       C.N.TRIPATHI
 WITH WRIA- 76595/2011 SABA ANJUM & OTHERS             INDRASEN SINGH TOMAR     
                                                       AMIT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. & ANOTHER     C.S.C.                   
                                                       K.S. KUSHWAHA
 WITH WRIA- 1442/2012  VASUDEV CHAURASIA & OTHERS      RAVINDRA PRAKASH SRIV.   
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS      C.S.C.                   
                                                       AKHILESH KUMAR
                                                       R.A. AKHTAR
 WITH WRIA- 75392/2011 VIJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI & ANOTHER  AJOY KUMAR BANERJEE      
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS      C.S.C.                   
                                                       K.A. USMANI
 WITH WRIA- 2614/2012  MAHESH CHANDRA                  BHUPENDRA PAL SINGH      
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS      C.S.C.                   
                                                       S.S. BHADAURIYA
 WITH WRIA- 2608/2012  MOHD. SADAB                     SYED IRFAN ALI           
                                                       MOHD. NAUSHAD
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS      C.S.C.                   
                                                       ILLEGIBLE
 WITH WRIA- 6826/2012  VIMLESH KUMAR                   ALOK KUMAR YADAV         
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS      C.S.C.                   
                                                       R.S. PRASAD
                                                       R.A. AKTAR
 WITH WRIA- 17607/2012 PAWAN KUMAR                     BHAWESH PRATAP SINGH     
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. & ANOTHER     C.S.C.                   
 WITH WRIA- 29/2012    SHIV PRAKASH KUSHWAHA           S.K. MISHRA              
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS      C.S.C.                   
                                                       RAJESHWAR SINGH
                                                       R.A. AKTAR
                                                       K.S.KUSHWAHA

Sunday 13 May 2012

UPTET : उर्दू शिक्षकों की भर्ती का मामला , टीईटी की अनिवार्यता खत्म होगी !

UPTET : उर्दू शिक्षकों की भर्ती का मामला , टीईटी की अनिवार्यता खत्म होगी !
•यूपी सरकार करेगी एनसीटीई से अनुरोध 
लखनऊ। बेसिक शिक्षा परिषद के प्राइमरी स्कूलों में उर्दू शिक्षकों की भर्ती के लिए शिक्षक पात्रता परीक्षा (टीईटी) की अनिवार्यता खत्म करने की तैयारी है। शासन में इस संबंध में उच्चाधिकारियों की बैठक हो चुकी है। इसको लेकर प्रदेश सरकार शीघ्र ही राष्ट्रीय अध्यापक शिक्षा परिषद (एनसीटीई) से अनुरोध करेगी। वहां से अनुमति के बाद मोअल्लिम-ए-उर्दू और डिप्लोमा इन उर्दू टीचिंग करने वालों के लिए छह माह की ट्रेनिंग देकर 3480 पदों पर उर्दू सहायक अध्यापकों की भर्ती होगी

प्रदेश में वर्ष 1994-95 में प्राइमरी स्कूलों में उर्दू के सहायक अध्यापक रखे गए थे। विभाग ने मोअल्लिम-ए-उर्दू और डिप्लेमा इन उर्दू टीचिंग उपाधि को इसके लिए पात्र माना था, लेकिन बाद में इन उपाधियों को अपात्र बताया गया। मोअल्लिम-ए-उर्दू वालों ने हाईकोर्ट में याचिका दाखिल की, जिसमें फैसला उनके पक्ष में हुआ। राज्य सरकार ने इसके विरोध में सुप्रीम कोर्ट में विशेष अनुज्ञा याचिका (एसएलपी) दाखिल की। सुप्रीम कोर्ट में मामले की सुनवाई चल ही रही थी कि 29 जून 2011 को तत्कालीन मायावती सरकार ने एसएलपी वापस लेकर इन उपाधिधारकों को प्राइमरी स्कूलों में सहायक अध्यापक बनाने का निर्णय कर लिया। 1997 से पहले मोअल्लिम-ए-उर्दू और डिप्लोमा इन उर्दू टीचिंग करने वालों को पात्र माना गया
इस आधार पर नवंबर 2011 में टीईटी में इनको शामिल होने की अनुमति दी गई, लेकिन ये टीईटी दिए बिना ही शिक्षक बनना चाहते थे। कुछ उपाधिधारक टीईटी में शामिल हो गए थे, लेकिन अधिकतर शामिल नहीं हुए इन लोगों ने मुख्यमंत्री अखिलेश यादव से मुलाकात कर टीईटी की अनिवार्यता समाप्त कर शिक्षक बनाने की मांग की। सूत्रों का कहना है कि हाल ही में मुख्यमंत्री के निर्देश पर शासन में उच्चाधिकारियों की बैठक में तय किया गया कि एनसीटीई से मोअल्लिम-ए-उर्दू और डिप्लोमा इन उर्दू टीचिंग उपाधिधारकों को इससे अलग करने का अनुरोध किया जाएगा
News : Amar Ujala (13.5.12)

Saturday 12 May 2012

RTET Rajasthan : No eligibility relaxation in teachers test, rules high court

No eligibility relaxation in teachers test, rules high court
B. Ed candidates after 1st Jan 2012 are not eligible for Primary Teacher jobs
Big Shock to B. Ed Candidates

RTET Rajasthan News
JAIPUR: The Rajasthan High Court on Friday declined to direct the National Council for Teacher Education (NCTE) to allow relaxation in the eligibility conditions to candidates aspiring to take the recruitment test for Grade-III teachers scheduled in June.

Nearly 1000 petitions were filed by thousands of aspiring candidates seeking the relaxation on the ground that the state government's delay in holding the recruitment test was responsible for their ineligibility. The state government would be holding a recruitment test to fill around 42,000 vacancies of teachers in rural areas through the zila parishad.

As per the NCTE notification of August 23, 2010, graduates with a BEd degree were eligible appear for the Rajasthan Teachers Eligibility Test ( RTET) level-I recruitment test only till January 1, 2012. After this cut off date, the candidates were required to have the Basic School Training Certificate (BSTC) or Senior Teaching Certificate (STC) to take the test. The petitioners argued that the government failed to hold the recruitment test before January 1, 2012 so the eligibility relaxation should be granted.

It was reasoned that Section 23 of the Right to Education (RTE) Act talked about giving five years relaxation to teachers who did not posses the required eligibility qualification. The single bench of Justice M N Bhandari, however, disposed of the bunch of petitions saying that the two conditions under which relaxation in eligibility could be provided under the law did not exist in the present case.

As per the law, relaxation could be granted if the number of eligible candidates was not equal to the number of advertised posts. The second condition under which relaxation could be granted was when there did not exist enough number of institutions to teach the large number of candidates who aspired to acquire the eligibility conditions.
News : Times of India (12.5.12)
comments

टीईटी अनु‌र्त्तीण अभ्यर्थियों ने खोला मोर्चा

मऊ : अभी तक टीईटी पास करने वाले ही नौकरी मांग रहे थे। लेकिन अब टीईटी परीक्षा में असफल छात्रों ने भी विशिष्ट बीटीसी भर्ती प्रक्रिया के तहत अध्यापक बनाने की मांग तेज कर दी है। 
बीएड बेरोजगार मोर्चा के तत्वावधान में बेरोजगारों ने शुक्रवार को जीवन राम इंटर कालेज के प्रांगण में बैठक कर इस मुद्दे को लेकर सड़क से संसद तक आंदोलन करने का निर्णय लिया। इस दौरान यूपी टीईटी परीक्षा में बैठने हेतु बीएड डिग्री धारियों को मात्र एक बार बैठने देने का भी तीव्र विरोध किया गया। कहा गया कि टीईटी मात्र एक पात्रता परीक्षा है न कि एक अध्यापक का सम्पूर्ण मूल्यांकन। एक अध्यापक का सम्पूर्ण मूल्यांकन तो उसका प्रशिक्षण ही है। देश की सर्वोच्च प्रतिष्ठित परीक्षा आईएएस में भी सम्मिलित होने के लिये परीक्षार्थियों को तीन-चार बार अवसर दिया जाता है। कहा गया है कि लाखों खर्च करके विद्यार्थी बीएड प्रशिक्षण लिये हैं और इस प्रकार मात्र एक बार पात्रता परीक्षा में सम्मिलित कराकर एकाएक आगे के लिये प्रतिबंधित कर देना उनके साथ अन्याय है। इस अवसर पर अरविन्द यादव, राजेश यादव, गौतम कुमार यादव, ओमप्रकाश यादव, आशीष कुमार, संगीता रानी, प्रमोद कुमार यादव, गोविन्द यादव, पुष्पा देवी आदि मौजूद रहे।
Source- Jagran
11-5-2012
0 comments

Friday 4 May 2012

UPTET : Allahabad High Court Cases Club All Cases Related to UP Primary Teacher Recruitment Through TET Exam


UPTET : Allahabad High Court Cases Club All Cases Related to UP Primary Teacher Recruitment Through TET Exam 
See Details : -
64. DF    76039/2011 YADAV KAPILDEV LAL BAHADUR      ALOK KUMAR YADAV    
                                                       RAJESH YADAV
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS      C.S.C.              
                                                       K.S. KUSHWAHA
 WITH WRIA- 76355/2011 SARASWATI SRIVASTAVA            SAROJ YADAV        
                       Vs. THE STATE OF U.P. AND OTHE  C.S.C.              
                       -RS                             C.N.TRIPATHI
                                                       R.A.AKHTAR
 WITH WRIA- 76392/2011 SHIVANI                         ABHISHEK SRIVASTAVA
                       Vs. THE STATE OF U.P. AND OTHE  C.S.C.              
                       -RS                             RAJEEV JOSHI
                                                       C.N.TRIPATHI
 WITH WRIA- 76595/2011 SABA ANJUM & OTHERS             INDRASEN SINGH TOMAR
                                                       AMIT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. & ANOTHER     C.S.C.              
                                                       K.S. KUSHWAHA
 WITH WRIA- 1442/2012  VASUDEV CHAURASIA & OTHERS      RAVINDRA PRAKASH SRIV.
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS      C.S.C.              
                                                       AKHILESH KUMAR
                                                       R.A. AKHTAR
 WITH WRIA- 75392/2011 VIJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI & ANOTHER  AJOY KUMAR BANERJEE  
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS      C.S.C.              
                                                       K.A. USMANI
 WITH WRIA- 2614/2012  MAHESH CHANDRA                  BHUPENDRA PAL SINGH
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS      C.S.C.              
                                                       S.S. BHADAURIYA
 WITH WRIA- 2608/2012  MOHD. SADAB                     SYED IRFAN ALI      
                                                       MOHD. NAUSHAD
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS      C.S.C.              
                                                       ILLEGIBLE
 WITH WRIA- 6826/2012  VIMLESH KUMAR                   ALOK KUMAR YADAV    
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS      C.S.C.              
                                                       R.S. PRASAD
                                                       R.A. AKTAR
 WITH WRIA- 51336/2010 SMT. MINTOO KUMARI              NARENDRA PRATAP SINGH
                       Vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS    C.S.C.              
                                                       K.S. KUSHWAHA


Case Status - Allahabad
Pending
Writ - A : 76039 of 2011 [Varanasi]
Petitioner:
YADAV KAPILDEV LAL BAHADUR
Respondent:
STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS
Counsel (Pet.):
ALOK KUMAR YADAV
Counsel (Res.):
C.S.C.
Category:
Service-Writ Petitions Relating To Primary Education (teaching Staff) (single Bench)-Appointment
Date of Filing:
21/12/2011
Last Listed on:
02/05/2012 in Court No. 33
Next Listing Date (Likely):
15/05/2012

This is not an authentic/certified copy of the information regarding status of a case. Authentic/certified information may be obtained under Chapter VIII Rule 30 of Allahabad High Court Rules. Mistake, if any, may be brought to the notice of OSD (Computer).


Source : http://allahabadhighcourt.in/casestatus/caseDetailA.jsp?type=WRIA&num=76039&year=2011
*********************

?Court No. - 33

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 76355 of 2011

Petitioner :- Saraswati Srivastava
Respondent :- The State Of U.P. And Others
Petitioner Counsel :- Saroj Yadav
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.,C.N.Tripathi,R.A.Akhtar

Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
1. Sri C.N. Tripathi, learned counsel appearing for respondents no. 3 to 5 prays for and is allowed a week's time to seek instruction, whether advertisement in question would cover the candidates who possess educational qualification mentioned in regulation framed by N.C.T.E. eligible for appointment of primary teachers are not.
2. List on 09.01.2012.
Order Date :- 2.1.2012
AK
Source : http://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebShowJudgment.do?judgmentID=1605269


HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

?Court No. - 33

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 76355 of 2011

Petitioner :- Saraswati Srivastava
Respondent :- The State Of U.P. And Others
Petitioner Counsel :- Saroj Yadav
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.,C.N.Tripathi,R.A.Akhtar

Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
Connect with Writ Petition No.76039 of 2011 and put up on the date fixed in the aforesaid matter. 
In the meantime, respondents may file counter affidavit.
Order Date :- 11.1.2012
KA
Source : http://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebShowJudgment.do?judgmentID=1627319

*********************

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

?Court No. - 33

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 76392 of 2011

Petitioner :- Shivani
Respondent :- The State Of U.P. And Others
Petitioner Counsel :- Abhishek Srivastava
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.,C.N.Tripathi,Rajeev Joshi

Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
Connect with Writ Petition No.76039 of 2011 and put up on the date fixed in the aforesaid matter. 
In the meantime, respondents may file counter affidavit. 
Order Date :- 11.1.2012
KA
Source : http://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebShowJudgment.do?judgmentID=1627315
****************


HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

?Court No. - 33

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 76392 of 2011

Petitioner :- Shivani
Respondent :- The State Of U.P. And Others
Petitioner Counsel :- Abhishek Srivastava
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.,C.N.Tripathi,Rajeev Joshi

Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
1. Sri C.N. Tripathi, learned counsel appearing for respondents no. 2 and 5 prays for and is allowed a week's time to file affidavit specifically stating, whether the present advertisement is confined only for six months teachers training and whether after completion of this training any process of recruitment in accordance with U.P. Basic Education Teachers Services Rules, 1981 shall further be made or not.
2. List on 09.01.2012.
Order Date :- 2.1.2012
AK

Source : http://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebShowJudgment.do?judgmentID=1605289
***************

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

?Court No. - 33

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 76595 of 2011

Petitioner :- Saba Anjum & Others
Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Another
Petitioner Counsel :- Indrasen Singh Tomar,Amit Kumar Srivastava
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.,K.S. Kushwaha

Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
Connect with Writ Petition No.76039 of 2011 and put up on the date fixed in the aforesaid matter.
In the meantime, respondents may file counter affidavit.
Order Date :- 11.1.2012
KA

Source : http://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebShowJudgment.do?judgmentID=1627320
*******************

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

?Court No. - 33

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 76595 of 2011

Petitioner :- Saba Anjum & Others
Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Another
Petitioner Counsel :- Indrasen Singh Tomar,Amit Kumar Srivastava
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.,K.S. Kushwaha

Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
As prayed, put up on 09.01.2012 to enable learned counsel for the respondents to seek instructions, whether the qualification provided in N.C.T.E. regulation would be treated to be a valid qualification for considering eligibility of candidates for appointment and training as Assistant Teachers in Primary Schools.
Order Date :- 3.1.2012
AK

Source : http://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebShowJudgment.do?judgmentID=1607771
*******************

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

?Court No. - 33

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 1442 of 2012

Petitioner :- Vasudev Chaurasia & Others
Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Others
Petitioner Counsel :- Ravindra Prakash Sriv.
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.,Akhilesh Kumar,R.A. Akhtar

Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
Connect with Writ Petition No.76039 of 2011 and put up on the date fixed in the aforesaid matter.
In the meantime, respondents may file counter affidavit.
Order Date :- 11.1.2012
KA

Source : http://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebShowJudgment.do?judgmentID=1627284
******************

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

?Court No. - 33

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 75392 of 2011

Petitioner :- Vijay Kumar Tripathi & Another
Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Others
Petitioner Counsel :- Ajoy Kumar Banerjee
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.,K.A. Usmani

Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
Learned counsel for respondents No.2 and 3 prays for and is allowed a week's time to file an affidavit and inform whether candidates possessing requisite qualification prescribed in Regulation framed by NCTE are all entitled or only candidates having B.Ed. qualification would be considered for the purposes of six months' training in question. 
List/put up on 09.01.2012.
Order Date :- 2.1.2012
KA

Source : http://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebShowJudgment.do?judgmentID=1605749
*****************

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

?Court No. - 33

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 75392 of 2011

Petitioner :- Vijay Kumar Tripathi & Another
Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Others
Petitioner Counsel :- Ajoy Kumar Banerjee
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.,K.A. Usmani

Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
Connect with Writ Petition No.76039 of 2011 and put up on the date fixed in the aforesaid matter.
In the meantime, respondents may file counter affidavit.
Order Date :- 11.1.2012
KA

Source : http://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebShowJudgment.do?judgmentID=1627318
*****************

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

?Court No. - 18

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 2614 of 2012

Petitioner :- Mahesh Chandra
Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Others
Petitioner Counsel :- Bhupendra Pal Singh
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.,S.S. Bhadauriya

Hon'ble Ran Vijai Singh,J.
It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that identical writ petition no. 76039 of 2011is coming on 01.02.2012.
With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, put up this matter as fresh on 01.02.2012.
Order Date :- 16.1.2012
PKB

Source : http://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebShowJudgment.do?judgmentID=1636181
**************

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

?Court No. - 33

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 2614 of 2012

Petitioner :- Mahesh Chandra
Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Others
Petitioner Counsel :- Bhupendra Pal Singh
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.,S.S. Bhadauriya

Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
Connect and list along with Writ Petition No.76039 of 2011.
Order Date :- 1.2.2012
KA

Source : http://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebShowJudgment.do?judgmentID=1663614
****************

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

?Court No. - 18

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 2608 of 2012

Petitioner :- Mohd. Sadab
Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Others
Petitioner Counsel :- Syed Irfan Ali,Mohd. Naushad
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.,Illegible

Hon'ble Ran Vijai Singh,J.
It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that identical writ petition no. 76039 of 2011is coming on 01.02.2012. 
With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, put up this matter as fresh on 01.02.2012.
Order Date :- 16.1.2012
PKB

Source : http://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebShowJudgment.do?judgmentID=1636184
*************

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

?Court No. - 33

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 2608 of 2012

Petitioner :- Mohd. Sadab
Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Others
Petitioner Counsel :- Syed Irfan Ali,Mohd. Naushad
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.,Illegible

Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
Connect and list along with Writ Petition No.76039 of 2011.
Order Date :- 1.2.2012
KA

Source : http://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebShowJudgment.do?judgmentID=1663613
************

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

?Court No. - 33

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 6826 of 2012

Petitioner :- Vimlesh Kumar
Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Others
Petitioner Counsel :- Alok Kumar Yadav
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.,R.A. Aktar,R.S. Prasad

Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
Put up alongwith Writ Petition No. 76039 of 2011 on the date fixed, i.e., 10.02.2012. 
Order Date :- 7.2.2012
AK

Source : http://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebShowJudgment.do?judgmentID=1675078
**************

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

?Court No. - 18

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 51336 of 2010

Petitioner :- Smt. Mintoo Kumari
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others
Petitioner Counsel :- Narendra Pratap Singh
Respondent Counsel :- C. S. C.

Hon'ble V.K. Shukla,J.
��� Learned Standing counsel has accepted notice on behalf of respondent nos. 1 to 4.
��� Six weeks time is accorded to each one of the respondents to file counter affidavit. Rejoinder affidavit may be filed within next two weeks.
��� List thereafter.
Order Date :- 25.8.2010
Dhruv

Source : http://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebShowJudgment.do?judgmentID=769769
*************

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

?Court No. - 2

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 51336 of 2010

Petitioner :- Smt. Mintoo Kumari
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others
Petitioner Counsel :- Narendra Pratap Singh
Respondent Counsel :- C. S. C.,K.S. Kushwaha

Hon'ble Bharati Sapru,J.
��� List is revised.� Learned counsel for respondent No.4 is not present.
��� List in the next cause list.
Order Date :- 14.7.2011
L.F./12

Source : http://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebShowJudgment.do?judgmentID=1309170

Mr Hari Om Sharma Asked Some Questions from NCTE regarding Teachers Recruitment in UP through TET

Mr Hari Om Sharma Asked Some Questions from NCTE regarding Teachers Recruitment in UP through TET



From: Hari Om Sharma <hariomsharma1977@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 12:02 PM
Subject: NCTE Jaipur R.T.I. Letter Dated on 13.04.2012


See Scanned Images



































































This application having shortcomings -

1. Identity card with address proof details not specifide
2. There is some standard details/ format defined by RTI for information seekers :
(a) Applicant is above BPL or not.
(b) The information requested is not exempted under section 8 and 9 of RTI Act.

See Details / Application Format regarding RTI (OR visit www.rti.india.gov.in / www.rti.gov.in / contact related authority)

See Details Here Also : http://naukri-recruitment-result.blogspot.in/search/label/RTI